BAGIRATH SINGH AND ANR. versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.
The 1995 Consolidation Scheme for Shamlat Deh lands, framed pursuant to unchallenged directions of the High Court and in accordance with Wajab-ul-Arz, is valid, having already been upheld by the High Court and this Court, and cannot be further challenged under Section 42 of the Act.
- Parties
- Appellants: Bagirath Singh and Anr.; Respondents: State of Haryana and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 06 September 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal (special Leave) From Punjab and Haryana High Court, Final Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Consolidation Scheme, Village Common Lands, Shamlat Deh Lands, Repartition, Wajab Ul Arz
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bagirath Singh and Anr.
Appellants
State of Haryana and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal (special Leave) From Punjab and Haryana High Court, Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Validity of the 1995 Consolidation Scheme for Shamlat Deh lands
- 2 Challenge to orders under Section 42 of the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948
- 3 Implementation of High Court directions regarding Shamlat Deh lands
Ratio Decidendi
The 1995 Consolidation Scheme for Shamlat Deh lands, framed pursuant to unchallenged directions of the High Court and in accordance with Wajab-ul-Arz, is valid, having already been upheld by the High Court and this Court, and cannot be further challenged under Section 42 of the Act.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs.
- The 1995 Consolidation Scheme stands valid in relation to Shamlat Deh lands.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment