SIRI RAM BATRA AND ORS. versus FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER, DELHI AND ORS.
Appellants, having lost rights over land bearing Khasra No.324 and having accepted land No.679 in lieu, are not entitled to benefit under the amended Scheme as bhumidars, since they no longer had interest in the land at the time of amendment. The benefit is to accrue to persons who lost their lands and, where the land had been sold after repartition, to the purchaser.
- Parties
- Appellants: Siri Ram Batra and Ors.; Respondents: Financial Commissioner, Delhi and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 17 September 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Letters Patent Appeal and Writ Petition Decided by Delhi High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Consolidation Proceedings, Interpretation of Statutes, Allotment of Land, Benefit of Beshi Phirni, Rights of Bhumidars
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Siri Ram Batra and Ors.
Appellants
Financial Commissioner, Delhi and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Letters Patent Appeal and Writ Petition Decided by Delhi High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Entitlement of appellants to benefit of Beshi Phirni area under amended Scheme of consolidation
- 2 Interpretation of 'old bhumidars' under the Scheme
Ratio Decidendi
Appellants, having lost rights over land bearing Khasra No.324 and having accepted land No.679 in lieu, are not entitled to benefit under the amended Scheme as bhumidars, since they no longer had interest in the land at the time of amendment. The benefit is to accrue to persons who lost their lands and, where the land had been sold after repartition, to the purchaser.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with no order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment