RAVI DUTT SHARMA versus RATAN LAL BHARGAVA
Sections 14A, 25A, 25B, and 25C of the Delhi Rent Control Act are valid and not ultra vires Article 14. The procedure incorporated in Chapter IIIA of the Rent Act, as a special law, prevails over the requirements of the Slum Act to the extent of inconsistency. Landlords proceeding under sections 14(1)(e) or 14A are not required to obtain permission from the Competent Authority under section 19(1)(a) of the Slum Act.
- Parties
- Appellant/tenant: Ravi Dutt Sharma; Respondent/landlord: Ratan Lal Bhargava; Appellant/petitioner (s.l.p.): Smt. Puspa Rani; Respondents (s.l.p.): Swaran Kumar and others
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 20 February 1984
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal and Special Leave Petition / Appeal From Order of Eviction Affirmed by Delhi High Court; SLP Heard Together
- Outcome
- Appeal and Special Leave Petition dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Delhi Rent Control Act, Slum Areas (improvement and Clearance) Act, Ultra Vires Challenge, Article 14 Equality Before Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ravi Dutt Sharma
Appellant/tenant
Ratan Lal Bhargava
Respondent/landlord
Smt. Puspa Rani
Appellant/petitioner (s.l.p.)
Swaran Kumar and others
Respondents (s.l.p.)
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal and Special Leave Petition / Appeal From Order of Eviction Affirmed by Delhi High Court; SLP Heard Together
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sections 14A, 25A, 25B, and 25C of the Delhi Rent Control Act are ultra vires Article 14 of the Constitution
- 2 Whether the Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act requires permission from Competent Authority for eviction suits under sections 14(1)(e) or 14A of the Rent Act
- 3 Whether new procedure in the Rent Act prevails over Slum Act in case of inconsistency
Ratio Decidendi
Sections 14A, 25A, 25B, and 25C of the Delhi Rent Control Act are valid and not ultra vires Article 14. The procedure incorporated in Chapter IIIA of the Rent Act, as a special law, prevails over the requirements of the Slum Act to the extent of inconsistency. Landlords proceeding under sections 14(1)(e) or 14A are not required to obtain permission from the Competent Authority under section 19(1)(a) of the Slum Act.
Court Disposition
Appeal and Special Leave Petition dismissed
Orders
- High Court order of eviction affirmed
- Applications of tenants for setting aside eviction rejected
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment