MAHABIR COLD STORAGE versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PATNA
The appellant, being a newly constituted firm and not a successor in interest of the old firm, is not entitled to development rebate under section 33(1) as it did not satisfy the requirement of ownership and continuity under the Act.
- Parties
- Appellant Assessee: Mahabir Cold Storage; Respondent Revenue: Commissioner of Income Tax, Patna
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 07 December 1990
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment and Order of Patna High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Development Rebate, Ownership of Capital Assets, Business Succession, Assessment Under Income Tax Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mahabir Cold Storage
Appellant Assessee
Commissioner of Income Tax, Patna
Respondent Revenue
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment and Order of Patna High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Entitlement to development rebate under section 33(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by newly constituted partnership firm
- 2 Unity of ownership and use of asset in business for development rebate
- 3 Succession and separate assessable identity in income tax law
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant, being a newly constituted firm and not a successor in interest of the old firm, is not entitled to development rebate under section 33(1) as it did not satisfy the requirement of ownership and continuity under the Act.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Reference answered in favour of Revenue and against assessee
- Appellant not entitled to development rebate under section 33(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment