DON AYENGIA versus THE STATE OF ASSAM & ANR
The cheques were issued pursuant to an acknowledged debt and liability to pay Rs.10,00,000/- within one month, supported by the promissory note and respondent's endorsement. Presentation of cheques upon failure to pay constitutes an actionable offence under Section 138. The High Court erred in setting aside the conviction as the cheques had a direct nexus with the liability.
- Parties
- Appellant/complainant: Don Ayengia; Respondent No.2/accused: Haren Mudoi; Respondent No.1 (deceased)/accused: Nazimul Islam
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 28 January 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Review of High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; High Court judgment set aside to the extent it allowed Criminal Revision No.41 of 2012; conviction and order of appellate court restored.
- Legal Topics
- Dishonour of Cheques, Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, Promissory Notes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Don Ayengia
Appellant/complainant
Haren Mudoi
Respondent No.2/accused
Nazimul Islam
Respondent No.1 (deceased)/accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Review of High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether cheques issued by the respondent were meant to discharge any debt or liability within the meaning of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
- 2 Whether respondent had liability under Section 138 for dishonour of cheques given as security
- 3 Whether post-dated cheques issued for refund of an advance are actionable under Section 138
Ratio Decidendi
The cheques were issued pursuant to an acknowledged debt and liability to pay Rs.10,00,000/- within one month, supported by the promissory note and respondent's endorsement. Presentation of cheques upon failure to pay constitutes an actionable offence under Section 138. The High Court erred in setting aside the conviction as the cheques had a direct nexus with the liability.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; High Court judgment set aside to the extent it allowed Criminal Revision No.41 of 2012; conviction and order of appellate court restored.
Orders
- Order passed by appellate court restored against respondent; compensation to complainant reaffirmed; no costs imposed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment