SARASWATHY versus BABU
The act of the husband, including continued refusal to allow the wife to reside in the shared household after court orders, constitutes domestic violence under Section 3 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Courts can take into account conduct prior to the Act’s commencement while granting reliefs under Sections 18, 19, and 20 of the Act.
- Parties
- Appellant Wife: Saraswathy; Respondent Husband: Babu
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 25 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal No. 1999 of 2013 / Appeal Against Judgment and Order Dated 13th December, 2011 of the High Court of Madras in Cr L R.c. No. 1321 of 2010
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; High Court judgment set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Domestic Violence, Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Maintenance, Residence Orders, Compensation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Saraswathy
Appellant Wife
Babu
Respondent Husband
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal No. 1999 of 2013 / Appeal Against Judgment and Order Dated 13th December, 2011 of the High Court of Madras in Cr L R.c. No. 1321 of 2010
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether husband's refusal to comply with court order amounts to 'domestic violence' under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005
- 2 Whether conduct prior to commencement of the Act can be considered for reliefs under the Act
Ratio Decidendi
The act of the husband, including continued refusal to allow the wife to reside in the shared household after court orders, constitutes domestic violence under Section 3 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Courts can take into account conduct prior to the Act’s commencement while granting reliefs under Sections 18, 19, and 20 of the Act.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; High Court judgment set aside.
Orders
- Respondent-husband directed to comply with lower court orders regarding residence and maintenance within three months.
- Respondent-husband directed to pay Rs.5,00,000/- as compensation and damages to appellant-wife within six months from date of Supreme Court order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment