DAKAYA @ DAKAIAH versus ANJANI
As the tenant tendered the full arrears before institution of the eviction suit, there was no subsisting cause of action for wilful default; lower courts erred in not appreciating this, and eviction order is to be set aside.
- Parties
- Appellant/tenant: Dakaya @ Dakaiah; Respondent/landlady: An. Jani
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 12 October 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed. Eviction order set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Eviction, Default in Payment of Rent, Wilful Default, Tender of Arrears Before Suit, Equity in Rent Disputes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dakaya @ Dakaiah
Appellant/tenant
An. Jani
Respondent/landlady
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a tenant's tender of all arrears before institution of eviction proceedings removes the cause of action for eviction on ground of wilful default under Section 10 of the A.P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960
- 2 Whether the lower courts erred in granting an eviction order despite full payment before institution of suit
Ratio Decidendi
As the tenant tendered the full arrears before institution of the eviction suit, there was no subsisting cause of action for wilful default; lower courts erred in not appreciating this, and eviction order is to be set aside.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed. Eviction order set aside.
Orders
- Tenant to pay respondent-landlady rent for the premises with effect from October 1, 1995 at Rs. 550 per month.
- Tenant to pay any remaining amount towards rent at old rate of Rs. 375 per month till September 30, 1995 within six weeks from the judgment date; failure will result in dismissal of the appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment