INDERJEET KAUR versus NIRPAL SINGH
The Additional Rent Controller committed a material irregularity and exceeded his jurisdiction by refusing leave to defend at the stage of contesting the eviction petition despite disputed facts and triable issues. Prima facie facts disclosed by the tenant sufficed to entitle leave to defend under Section 25B(5); it was improper to adjudicate merits without trial.
- Parties
- Appellant Tenant: Inderjeet Kaur; Respondent Landlord: Nirpal Singh
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Order of Additional Rent Controller and High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; leave to defend granted
- Legal Topics
- Eviction, Leave to Defend, Bona Fide Requirement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Inderjeet Kaur
Appellant Tenant
Nirpal Singh
Respondent Landlord
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Order of Additional Rent Controller and High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the tenant can be denied leave to defend at the stage of contesting an eviction petition based on disputed facts and triable issues
- 2 Proper scope of Additional Rent Controller's duty under Section 25B(5) of the Delhi Rent Control Act
Ratio Decidendi
The Additional Rent Controller committed a material irregularity and exceeded his jurisdiction by refusing leave to defend at the stage of contesting the eviction petition despite disputed facts and triable issues. Prima facie facts disclosed by the tenant sufficed to entitle leave to defend under Section 25B(5); it was improper to adjudicate merits without trial.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; leave to defend granted
Orders
- Order of Additional Rent Controller set aside
- Order of High Court set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment