JOGINDER PAL versus NAVAL KISHORE BEHAL
The phrase 'for his own use' in Section 13(3)(a)(ii) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, must be interpreted widely and liberally to include not only the personal requirement of the landlord but also genuine requirements of his close family members, such as his son, provided such requirement is real and not a mere ruse for eviction.
- Parties
- Appellant/tenant: Joginder Pal; Respondent/landlord: Naval Kishore Behal
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 10 May 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Judgment of Punjab and Haryana High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Eviction, Bonafide Requirement, Interpretation of 'own Use' Under Rent Statutes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joginder Pal
Appellant/tenant
Naval Kishore Behal
Respondent/landlord
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Judgment of Punjab and Haryana High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the requirement of the landlord's son constitute 'own use' under Section 13(3)(a)(ii) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949?
Ratio Decidendi
The phrase 'for his own use' in Section 13(3)(a)(ii) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, must be interpreted widely and liberally to include not only the personal requirement of the landlord but also genuine requirements of his close family members, such as his son, provided such requirement is real and not a mere ruse for eviction.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Tenant allowed four months to vacate premises subject to clearing arrears and filing an undertaking to deliver vacant and peaceful possession after expiry of time.
- Compliance required within four weeks.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment