SARASWATI DEVI GUPTA versus SUDHA RANI AND ORS.
The right of the appellant as an assignee to execute the decree and to prefer appeals was conclusively determined and upheld by the Supreme Court; any challenge to her locus standi was barred and could not be entertained by the High Court or Executing Court thereafter.
- Parties
- Appellant/assignee: Saraswati Devi Gupta; Respondents/judgment Debtors: Sudha Rani and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal by Special Leave
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Execution of Decrees, Assignment of Decrees, Locus Standi
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Saraswati Devi Gupta
Appellant/assignee
Sudha Rani and Ors.
Respondents/judgment Debtors
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal by Special Leave
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the assignee of the decree-holder has locus standi to execute the decree and prefer appeals against orders relating to the decree
- 2 Whether the Executing Court can revisit the validity of the assignment after Supreme Court has upheld the assignment
Ratio Decidendi
The right of the appellant as an assignee to execute the decree and to prefer appeals was conclusively determined and upheld by the Supreme Court; any challenge to her locus standi was barred and could not be entertained by the High Court or Executing Court thereafter.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Judgment and order of Allahabad High Court dated 30th August, 1996 directing the Executing Court to decide the validity of the assignment is set aside.
- Objections by respondents challenging the locus standi of the appellant as assignee before the Executing Court are dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment