RAMGOPAL AND ANR. versus BALAJI MANDIR TRUST AND ORS.

RAMGOPAL AND ANR. versus BALAJI MANDIR TRUST AND ORS.

Where defendants have not challenged the applicability or the validity of the exemption notification nor pleaded against utilization of rental income by trust, eviction suit by religious trust is maintainable and trust entitled to benefit of notification under Section 3(2) of the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961.

Parties
Appellants: Ramgopal and Anr.; Respondents: Balaji Mandir Trust and Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
19 February 2003
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Disposition
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Exemption Notification, Maintainability of Suit, Rental Income Utilization, Section 3(2) of Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ramgopal and Anr.

Appellants

Balaji Mandir Trust and Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Disposition

  1. 1 Whether the religious trust is entitled to benefit under Section 3(2) exemption notification.
  2. 2 Whether the exemption notification can be general or should apply to a particular accommodation.
  3. 3 Whether suit for eviction is maintainable without proving rental income utilization for trust purposes.

Ratio Decidendi

Where defendants have not challenged the applicability or the validity of the exemption notification nor pleaded against utilization of rental income by trust, eviction suit by religious trust is maintainable and trust entitled to benefit of notification under Section 3(2) of the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Judgment and decree of High Court affirmed.
  • No order as to costs.