STATE OF KERALA ETC. versus GURUVAYUR DEVASWOM MANAGING COMMITTEE AND ORS. ETC.
Competent authority shall scrutinise and sanction expenditure incurred by Administrator for examinations; remuneration awarded by High Court in extraordinary circumstances is not to be treated as precedent in future without specific justification.
- Parties
- Petitioner: State of Kerala; Respondents: Guruvayur Devaswom Managing Committee and Ors.; Administrator: Raghavan
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 18 November 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Special Leave Petition (civil) / Supreme Court Order Disposing SLP
- Outcome
- Petition disposed with observations; in second SLP, permission to file granted and petition dismissed with liberty to apply for expunging remarks in High Court.
- Legal Topics
- Expenditure Sanction in Public Administration, Remuneration to Deputed Officers, Recruitment Procedure in Statutory Bodies
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
State of Kerala
Petitioner
Guruvayur Devaswom Managing Committee and Ors.
Respondents
Raghavan
Administrator
Procedural Posture
Special Leave Petition (civil) / Supreme Court Order Disposing SLP
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the direction to sanction expenditure incurred by the Administrator for examination was proper.
- 2 Whether the grant of remuneration to the Administrator for exemplary work should be treated as precedent.
Ratio Decidendi
Competent authority shall scrutinise and sanction expenditure incurred by Administrator for examinations; remuneration awarded by High Court in extraordinary circumstances is not to be treated as precedent in future without specific justification.
Court Disposition
Petition disposed with observations; in second SLP, permission to file granted and petition dismissed with liberty to apply for expunging remarks in High Court.
Orders
- Competent authority to scrutinise and sanction the expenditure as per procedure.
- Remuneration to Administrator not to be treated as precedent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment