RAVAL & CO. versus K. C. RAMACHANDRAN & ORS.
During the subsistence of a contractual tenancy, a landlord is not entitled to apply for fixation of fair rent under section 4(1) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960. It is only after the contract of tenancy is lawfully determined that such an application can be made by the landlord. The Act does not confer a new right to the landlord to seek higher rent during the contract period; its protections are not solely for the benefit of tenants, but the right to fix fair rent is restricted as long as the contract exists.
- Parties
- Appellant/tenant: Raval & Co.; Respondents/landlords: K. C. Ramachandran & Ors.; Intervener: B.R. Agrawala
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 11 December 1973
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court on Appeal From Madras High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed (per majority)
- Legal Topics
- Fixation of Fair Rent, Contractual Tenancy, Statutory Tenancy, Landlord Tenant Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Raval & Co.
Appellant/tenant
K. C. Ramachandran & Ors.
Respondents/landlords
B.R. Agrawala
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court on Appeal From Madras High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a landlord under the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 is entitled to apply for fixation of fair rent during the subsistence of a contractual tenancy
- 2 Meaning and applicability of the terms 'landlord' and 'tenant' under the Act
Ratio Decidendi
During the subsistence of a contractual tenancy, a landlord is not entitled to apply for fixation of fair rent under section 4(1) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960. It is only after the contract of tenancy is lawfully determined that such an application can be made by the landlord. The Act does not confer a new right to the landlord to seek higher rent during the contract period; its protections are not solely for the benefit of tenants, but the right to fix fair rent is restricted as long as the contract exists.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed (per majority)
Orders
- The appellant will pay the respondents' costs.
- No order as to costs in Civil Appeal No. 50 of 1968 per dissenting opinion.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment