RAMESH S/O CHOTALAL DALAL versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
In judging whether the serial 'Tamas' should be prohibited, the standard is that of the ordinary person for whom it is intended and not hypersensitive viewers; the established procedures under the Cinematograph Act were followed, the examining committee unanimously approved, and there is no evidence that the screening offends section 5B or violates fundamental rights; the serial, viewed in its entirety, conveys a message of peace and is not likely to incite communal disharmony.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Ramesh S/o Chotalal Dalal; Respondents: Union of India & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 16 February 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition (civil) No. 107 of 1988 Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, With Special Leave Petition Arising From Bombay High Court Appeal No. 96/88 / Final Judgment Petition and Special Leave Petition Dismissed
- Outcome
- Petition under Article 32 and special leave petition dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Expression, Censorship, Certification of Films, Communal Harmony, Public Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ramesh S/o Chotalal Dalal
Petitioner
Union of India & Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (civil) No. 107 of 1988 Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, With Special Leave Petition Arising From Bombay High Court Appeal No. 96/88 / Final Judgment Petition and Special Leave Petition Dismissed
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the exhibition of the TV serial 'Tamas' violates section 5B of the Cinematograph Act, 1952 and Articles 21 and 25 of the Constitution of India.
- 2 Whether the serial is likely to incite communal disharmony and hatred in violation of section 153A of the Indian Penal Code.
Ratio Decidendi
In judging whether the serial 'Tamas' should be prohibited, the standard is that of the ordinary person for whom it is intended and not hypersensitive viewers; the established procedures under the Cinematograph Act were followed, the examining committee unanimously approved, and there is no evidence that the screening offends section 5B or violates fundamental rights; the serial, viewed in its entirety, conveys a message of peace and is not likely to incite communal disharmony.
Court Disposition
Petition under Article 32 and special leave petition dismissed.
Orders
- Petition under Article 32 dismissed.
- Special leave petition arising from Bombay High Court judgment dated 23rd January, 1988 also dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment