SARDAR SARUP SINGH & OTHERS versus THE STATE OF PUNJAB & OTHERS

SARDAR SARUP SINGH & OTHERS versus THE STATE OF PUNJAB & OTHERS

Section 148-B of the Sikh Gurdwaras Act, 1925 as amended in 1959 is a temporary and transitional provision for representation from extended Pepsu areas, determined by administrative convenience rather than any principle of Sikh religion, and does not infringe Article 26(b) fundamental rights; manner of appointment or election to Board is not itself a matter of religion under Article 26(b).

Parties
Petitioners: Sardar Sarup Singh & Others; Respondents: The State of Punjab & Others
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
01 April 1959
Procedural Posture
Petition Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India / Original Jurisdiction; Final Judgment
Outcome
Petition dismissed
Legal Topics
Fundamental Rights, Freedom of Religion, Sikh Gurdwaras, Statutory Boards, Representation/elections
Constitutional Law Religious Institutions Law Fundamental Rights Freedom of Religion Sikh Gurdwaras Statutory Boards Representation/elections

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sardar Sarup Singh & Others

Petitioners

The State of Punjab & Others

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Petition Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India / Original Jurisdiction; Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Section 148-B of the Sikh Gurdwaras Act, 1925 as amended in 1959 violates the fundamental right under Article 26(b) of the Constitution to manage religious affairs.
  2. 2 Whether the method of election or nomination to the Gurdwara Board is a matter of religion for Article 26(b) purposes.

Ratio Decidendi

Section 148-B of the Sikh Gurdwaras Act, 1925 as amended in 1959 is a temporary and transitional provision for representation from extended Pepsu areas, determined by administrative convenience rather than any principle of Sikh religion, and does not infringe Article 26(b) fundamental rights; manner of appointment or election to Board is not itself a matter of religion under Article 26(b).

Court Disposition

Petition dismissed

Orders

  • Petitioners failed to establish a violation of fundamental rights under Article 26(b).
  • Petition dismissed with costs.