BHAIYA RAMANUJ PRATAP DEO versus LALU MAHESHANUJ PRATAP DEO & ORS. AND VICE-VERSA
Upon enforcement of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, the customary rule of primogeniture ceased to operate for impartible estates unless protected by statute or covenant. The estate devolved by survivorship among coparceners; possession by co-sharer was not adverse. Maintenance grants without proper registration could not transfer title but could indicate nature of possession. Relief in partition, not exclusive possession, was appropriate remedy.
- Parties
- Appellant in CA No. 209/70 and Respondent in CA No. 2280/70: Bhaiya Ramanuj Pratap Deo; Respondent in CA No. 209/70 and Appellant in CA No. 2280/70: Lalu Maheshanuj Pratap Deo alias Nila Bacha
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 26 August 1981
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Common Judgment and Decree of Patna High Court Dated 28th February, 1968
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's appeal dismissed. Defendant's appeal allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Impartible Estate, Primogeniture, Maintenance Grants, Customary Law, Partition, Registration of Deeds
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bhaiya Ramanuj Pratap Deo
Appellant in CA No. 209/70 and Respondent in CA No. 2280/70
Lalu Maheshanuj Pratap Deo alias Nila Bacha
Respondent in CA No. 209/70 and Appellant in CA No. 2280/70
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Common Judgment and Decree of Patna High Court Dated 28th February, 1968
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the provisions of section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 override the customary rule of primogeniture
- 2 Validity and effect of maintenance (khorposh) grants under Chota Nagpur Encumbered Estates Act and Bihar Land Reforms Act
- 3 Evidentiary value of unregistered maintenance deeds under Indian Registration Act
Ratio Decidendi
Upon enforcement of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, the customary rule of primogeniture ceased to operate for impartible estates unless protected by statute or covenant. The estate devolved by survivorship among coparceners; possession by co-sharer was not adverse. Maintenance grants without proper registration could not transfer title but could indicate nature of possession. Relief in partition, not exclusive possession, was appropriate remedy.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's appeal dismissed. Defendant's appeal allowed.
Orders
- Decree passed by the High Court is set aside.
- Decree of the Trial Court as affirmed by the first Appellate Court is restored.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment