OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Majority held that, while Section 10(22) could apply to foreign universities engaged in education in India, Oxford University Press in India was purely a commercial enterprise engaged in publishing and selling books with no educational activity in India. It was, therefore, not entitled to exemption under Section 10(22) as it existed for profit and not solely for educational purposes.
- Parties
- Appellant/assessee: Oxford University Press; Respondent/revenue: Commissioner of Income Tax
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 24 January 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court of India Judgment on Appeal From Bombay High Court Decision in IT Reference No. 82 of 1984
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed by majority.
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax Exemption, Section 10(22) Income Tax Act, Eligibility of Foreign Universities for Tax Exemption, Meaning of 'university', Literal Vs Purposive Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Oxford University Press
Appellant/assessee
Commissioner of Income Tax
Respondent/revenue
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court of India Judgment on Appeal From Bombay High Court Decision in IT Reference No. 82 of 1984
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a foreign university or its branch, engaged in publishing and selling books in India, is entitled to exemption under Section 10(22) of the Income Tax Act, 1961?
- 2 Is incorporation or imparting of education in India necessary for exemption to be claimed under Section 10(22) by a university?
- 3 Should 'University' in Section 10(22) be construed narrowly as per the UGC Act definition or in the broader sense?
Ratio Decidendi
Majority held that, while Section 10(22) could apply to foreign universities engaged in education in India, Oxford University Press in India was purely a commercial enterprise engaged in publishing and selling books with no educational activity in India. It was, therefore, not entitled to exemption under Section 10(22) as it existed for profit and not solely for educational purposes.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed by majority.
Orders
- Appeals dismissed. No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment