SUBE SINGH & ORS. ETC. ETC. versus STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.
The Punjab Borstal Act, 1926, by its terms (particularly s. 2(4)), excludes from its benefit any offence punishable with death, regardless of the punishment actually imposed. Section 302 IPC is punishable with death, hence, adolescents convicted under this section are not entitled to detention in a Borstal institution under s. 5 of the Act.
- Parties
- Petitioners: Sube Singh & Ors.; Respondents: State of Haryana & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 21 September 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition (criminal) Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India / Final Decision on Merits
- Outcome
- Writ petitions dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Punjab Borstal Act, 1926, Benefit of Borstal Detention to Adolescents Convicted Under Section 302 IPC, Sentencing of Adolescents Convicted for Murder
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sube Singh & Ors.
Petitioners
State of Haryana & Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (criminal) Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India / Final Decision on Merits
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether adolescents convicted for murder and sentenced under Section 302 IPC are entitled to the benefit of Section 5 of the Punjab Borstal Act, 1926.
Ratio Decidendi
The Punjab Borstal Act, 1926, by its terms (particularly s. 2(4)), excludes from its benefit any offence punishable with death, regardless of the punishment actually imposed. Section 302 IPC is punishable with death, hence, adolescents convicted under this section are not entitled to detention in a Borstal institution under s. 5 of the Act.
Court Disposition
Writ petitions dismissed.
Orders
- Each of the writ petitions is dismissed.
- There is no order for costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment