BACHAN LAL KALGOTRA versus STATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND OTHERS
Refugees from West Pakistan settled in Jammu & Kashmir are not permanent residents under section 6 of the Jammu & Kashmir Constitution and therefore are disentitled to certain rights and privileges within the State. Statutory provisions conferring special rights to permanent residents are protected by Article 35A and cannot be challenged as inconsistent with the fundamental rights guaranteed by Part III of the Constitution of India.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Bachan Lal Kalgotra; Respondents: State of Jammu & Kashmir and Others
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 20 February 1987
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition (civil) No. 7698 of 1982 / Original Jurisdiction; Final Order
- Outcome
- Petition dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Jammu & Kashmir Permanent Resident Status, Rights of Refugees From West Pakistan, Discrimination in Citizenship Rights, Application of Article 35 a, Validity of Jammu & Kashmir Resettlement Act, 1982
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bachan Lal Kalgotra
Petitioner
State of Jammu & Kashmir and Others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (civil) No. 7698 of 1982 / Original Jurisdiction; Final Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether refugees from West Pakistan settled in Jammu & Kashmir are entitled to permanent resident status and basic rights of citizenship within the State
- 2 Whether denial of rights to such refugees is inconsistent with the Constitution of India
- 3 Whether special rights conferred to returnees under the Resettlement Act, 1982 violate constitutional guarantees
Ratio Decidendi
Refugees from West Pakistan settled in Jammu & Kashmir are not permanent residents under section 6 of the Jammu & Kashmir Constitution and therefore are disentitled to certain rights and privileges within the State. Statutory provisions conferring special rights to permanent residents are protected by Article 35A and cannot be challenged as inconsistent with the fundamental rights guaranteed by Part III of the Constitution of India.
Court Disposition
Petition dismissed
Orders
- No relief granted; petitioners encouraged to seek legislative or executive action for redressal of grievances.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment