JUGAL KISHORE versus STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
Ceiling Authorities have jurisdiction to determine the genuineness of tenancy and whether transfers were bona fide or made in anticipation to defeat the Ceiling Act; Tenancy Authority's determination of tenancy does not bind Ceiling proceedings in this context; High Court's order upholding surplus land finding is correct.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Jugal Kishore; Respondents: State of Maharashtra & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 26 September 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Special Leave Petition (civil) / Supreme Court Decision on SLP Under Article 136
- Outcome
- Petition dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Ceiling Authority, Determination of Tenancy, Surplus Land Under Ceiling Act, Interrelation Between Tenancy and Ceiling Acts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jugal Kishore
Petitioner
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Special Leave Petition (civil) / Supreme Court Decision on SLP Under Article 136
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Ceiling Authority had jurisdiction to determine the issue of tenancy in light of Tenancy Act provisions
- 2 Whether land transferred to tenants should be excluded from ceiling calculations
- 3 Whether transfers were bona fide or in anticipation to defeat Ceiling Act provisions
Ratio Decidendi
Ceiling Authorities have jurisdiction to determine the genuineness of tenancy and whether transfers were bona fide or made in anticipation to defeat the Ceiling Act; Tenancy Authority's determination of tenancy does not bind Ceiling proceedings in this context; High Court's order upholding surplus land finding is correct.
Court Disposition
Petition dismissed
Orders
- Special Leave Petition fails and is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment