P.D. LAKHANI AND ANR. versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.
A complaint under s.182 IPC arising from an investigation ordered by the SSP is not maintainable if filed before the Magistrate by a subordinate officer such as the SHO; s.195(1) Cr.P.C. requires the complaint to be filed by the SSP or his administrative superior, and does not permit delegation to inferior officers.
- Parties
- Appellants: P.O. Lakhani and Anr.; Respondents: State of Punjab and Anr.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 22 April 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal From High Court Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; impugned judgment set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction to File Complaint, Maintainability of Complaint Under S.195(1) Cr.p.c., Delegation of Public Servant Authority, Invalid Complaint Under S.182 IPC
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
P.O. Lakhani and Anr.
Appellants
State of Punjab and Anr.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From High Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a complaint under s.182 IPC can be filed before the Magistrate by the SHO when the investigation was ordered by the SSP under s.195(1) Cr.P.C.
- 2 Whether such complaint is maintainable under the Code of Criminal Procedure
Ratio Decidendi
A complaint under s.182 IPC arising from an investigation ordered by the SSP is not maintainable if filed before the Magistrate by a subordinate officer such as the SHO; s.195(1) Cr.P.C. requires the complaint to be filed by the SSP or his administrative superior, and does not permit delegation to inferior officers.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; impugned judgment set aside.
Orders
- Judgment of High Court set aside.
- Any trial on the complaint by the SHO is without jurisdiction.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment