TEKI VENKATA RATNAM AND ORS . versus DY. COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENT AND ORS.

TEKI VENKATA RATNAM AND ORS . versus DY. COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENT AND ORS.

The Deputy Commissioner has power and jurisdiction under Section 87 of the 1987 Act to enquire into and decide whether a temple is public or private, notwithstanding any prior court declaration or decree. The Act applies to all Hindu religious institutions and places statutory presumption in favour of public status, and Section 160 ensures overriding effect over previous decrees.

Parties
Appellants: Teki Venkata Ratnam and Others; Respondents: Deputy Commissioner, Endowment and Others
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
07 August 2001
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Supreme Court Decision
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction Under Religious Endowment Statutes, Public Vs. Private Temples, Effect of Statutory Override on Prior Decrees

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Teki Venkata Ratnam and Others

Appellants

Deputy Commissioner, Endowment and Others

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Final Supreme Court Decision

  1. 1 Whether Deputy Commissioner of Endowments has power and jurisdiction to enquire into and decide a dispute whether a temple is public or private under Section 87 of Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions & Endowments Act, 1987

Ratio Decidendi

The Deputy Commissioner has power and jurisdiction under Section 87 of the 1987 Act to enquire into and decide whether a temple is public or private, notwithstanding any prior court declaration or decree. The Act applies to all Hindu religious institutions and places statutory presumption in favour of public status, and Section 160 ensures overriding effect over previous decrees.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • No order as to costs