DADAN RAM AND ORS. versus STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.
Before re-opening a concluded issue under Section 45-B of the Bihar Land Reforms Act, it is mandatory to issue notice and provide an opportunity of hearing to the parties in possession, i.e., parcha holders, as the proceedings are quasi-judicial and rights may be affected.
- Parties
- Appellants: Dadan Ram and Ors.; Respondents: State of Bihar and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 23 November 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Against High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal partly allowed; orders of High Court set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Land Ceiling, Natural Justice, Procedure Under Section 45 B, Hearing Rights, Distribution of Surplus Land
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dadan Ram and Ors.
Appellants
State of Bihar and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether parcha holders in possession are entitled to notice and opportunity of hearing when a case under Section 45-B of Bihar Land Reforms Act is re-opened
Ratio Decidendi
Before re-opening a concluded issue under Section 45-B of the Bihar Land Reforms Act, it is mandatory to issue notice and provide an opportunity of hearing to the parties in possession, i.e., parcha holders, as the proceedings are quasi-judicial and rights may be affected.
Court Disposition
Appeal partly allowed; orders of High Court set aside.
Orders
- State Government is free to pass fresh order under Section 45-B after affording opportunity to all parties including appellants.
- No costs ordered.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment