KONDOPANT versus ARJUNA AND ORS.
Raising additional grounds in the review petition is not a valid ground for review of the order regarding declaration as surplus holder under the Land Ceiling Act.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Kondopant; Respondents: Arjuna and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 12 September 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Review Petition / Final Disposal
- Outcome
- Review petition dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Land Ceiling Act, Review Petition, Surplus Holder Declaration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Kondopant
Petitioner
Arjuna and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Review Petition / Final Disposal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether raising additional grounds is a valid basis for review of the Court's previous order under the Land Ceiling Act
Ratio Decidendi
Raising additional grounds in the review petition is not a valid ground for review of the order regarding declaration as surplus holder under the Land Ceiling Act.
Court Disposition
Review petition dismissed
Orders
- Petition dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment