SETH BADRI PRASAD AND OTHERS versus SETH NAGARMAL AND OTHERS

SETH BADRI PRASAD AND OTHERS versus SETH NAGARMAL AND OTHERS

A suit for accounts by the members of an unregistered association consisting of more than 20 persons, formed in contravention of Section 4(2) of the Rewa State Companies Act, 1935, is not maintainable as the association is inherently illegal and the courts cannot aid enforcement of rights arising from such illegal association.

Parties
Appellants: Seth Badri Prasad and Others; Respondents: Seth Nagarmal and Others
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
09 December 1958
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From the Judgment and Decree Dated November 20, 1951, of the Former Court of Judicial Commissioner, Vindhya Pradesh
Outcome
Appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
Maintainability of Suit, Illegality of Association, Unregistered Associations, Section 4(2) Rewa Companies Act, 1935, Section 69(3)(a) Indian Partnership Act, 1932

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Seth Badri Prasad and Others

Appellants

Seth Nagarmal and Others

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From the Judgment and Decree Dated November 20, 1951, of the Former Court of Judicial Commissioner, Vindhya Pradesh

  1. 1 Whether a suit is maintainable by members of an unregistered association consisting of more than 20 persons contrary to Section 4(2) of the Rewa State Companies Act, 1935.
  2. 2 Whether accounts can be claimed from the president of such an association after its dissolution.

Ratio Decidendi

A suit for accounts by the members of an unregistered association consisting of more than 20 persons, formed in contravention of Section 4(2) of the Rewa State Companies Act, 1935, is not maintainable as the association is inherently illegal and the courts cannot aid enforcement of rights arising from such illegal association.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • The parties must bear their own costs of the hearing in this Court.