MAHARAJ DHIRAJ HIMMATSINGHJI & ORS. versus STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.

MAHARAJ DHIRAJ HIMMATSINGHJI & ORS. versus STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.

The order passed by the Maharaja of Jodhpur on 13.9.1946 was an ex-gratia gift and did not have the character of 'law' within the meaning of section 3(ii) of United State of Rajasthan Ordinance I of 1949. As such, it created no legally enforceable obligation against the State of Rajasthan.

Parties
Appellants: Maharaj Dhiraj Himmatsinghji & Ors.; Respondents: State of Rajasthan & Anr.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
12 November 1986
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeals / On Appeal by Certificate Under Article 133(1)(a) of the Constitution From the Rajasthan High Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeals dismissed
Legal Topics
Meaning of 'law' Under Ordinance, Enforceability of Sovereign's Orders, Succession/state Merger, Nature of Grants and Gifts by Rulers

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Maharaj Dhiraj Himmatsinghji & Ors.

Appellants

State of Rajasthan & Anr.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeals / On Appeal by Certificate Under Article 133(1)(a) of the Constitution From the Rajasthan High Court Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the order dated 13.9.1946 passed by the Maharaja of Jodhpur granting annual allowances constituted a 'law' under United State of Rajasthan Ordinance I of 1949 and was binding upon the State of Rajasthan.

Ratio Decidendi

The order passed by the Maharaja of Jodhpur on 13.9.1946 was an ex-gratia gift and did not have the character of 'law' within the meaning of section 3(ii) of United State of Rajasthan Ordinance I of 1949. As such, it created no legally enforceable obligation against the State of Rajasthan.

Court Disposition

Appeals dismissed

Orders

  • No order as to costs