SHYAM NARAYAN PRASAD versus KRISHNA PRASAD AND ORS.
The property allotted in partition remains coparcenary property with respect to male issue, and plaintiffs have a right in it; the exchange deed regarding immovable property is inadmissible as it was not registered per Registration Act requirements; suit by plaintiffs for declaration challenging the exchange deed is maintainable.
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant No.1: Shyam Narayan Prasad; Respondents/plaintiffs: Krishna Prasad and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 02 July 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Decision on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Mitakshara Law, Coparcenary Property, Partition, Exchange Deed, Registration Requirement, Admissibility of Documents, Section 53 a of Transfer of Property Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shyam Narayan Prasad
Appellant/defendant No.1
Krishna Prasad and Ors.
Respondents/plaintiffs
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Decision on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether property allotted to a son in partition retains the character of coparcenary property
- 2 Whether the suit filed by plaintiffs for declaration challenging the exchange deed was maintainable
- 3 Whether the exchange deed relating to immovable property required registration and is admissible in evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The property allotted in partition remains coparcenary property with respect to male issue, and plaintiffs have a right in it; the exchange deed regarding immovable property is inadmissible as it was not registered per Registration Act requirements; suit by plaintiffs for declaration challenging the exchange deed is maintainable.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment