BUDH SINGH versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.
Section 32A of the NDPS Act does not violate Articles 14, 20(1), or 21 of the Constitution. The exclusion of remission under Section 32A neither enlarges the period of incarceration nor increases the punishment for a convict beyond what was contemplated by the Act at the time of the offence. Remissions do not operate as reduction of judicially imposed sentences.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Budh Singh; Respondents: State of Haryana and Anr.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 11 March 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition (criminal) No. 15 of 2012 / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Writ petition dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Remission of Sentences, Constitutional Validity, Article 20(1), Article 14, Article 21
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Budh Singh
Petitioner
State of Haryana and Anr.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (criminal) No. 15 of 2012 / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Section 32A of the NDPS Act violates Articles 14, 20(1), and 21 of the Constitution
- 2 Whether exclusion of remission enlarges the period of incarceration beyond what was contemplated at the time of commission of the offence
- 3 Whether remission operates as reduction of sentence
Ratio Decidendi
Section 32A of the NDPS Act does not violate Articles 14, 20(1), or 21 of the Constitution. The exclusion of remission under Section 32A neither enlarges the period of incarceration nor increases the punishment for a convict beyond what was contemplated by the Act at the time of the offence. Remissions do not operate as reduction of judicially imposed sentences.
Court Disposition
Writ petition dismissed
Orders
- Writ petition dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment