SHAKTI YEZDANI & ANR. versus JAYANAND JAYANT SALGAONKAR & ORS.
Nomination under Section 109A of the Companies Act, 1956 and Bye-law 9.11 of the Depositories Act, 1996 does not confer absolute beneficial ownership of shares or securities on the nominee to the exclusion of legal heirs; the vesting and non-obstante language must be read in context and operate for the limited purpose of enabling companies/depositories to deal with the securities immediately after the holder's death and to protect them from multiplicity of claims, but succession to the securities remains governed by the applicable succession laws.
- Parties
- Appellants: Shakti Yezdani & Anr.; Respondents: Jayanand Jayant Salgaonkar & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Nomination of Shares, Nominee Rights, Vesting of Securities, Non Obstante Clause, Interaction Between Nomination and Law of Succession
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shakti Yezdani & Anr.
Appellants
Jayanand Jayant Salgaonkar & Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a nominee appointed under Section 109A Companies Act, 1956 read with the Bye-laws under the Depositories Act, 1996 is entitled to beneficial ownership of shares/securities to the exclusion of persons entitled under succession law
- 2 Whether a nominee holds shares/securities absolutely or in trust/for the legal representatives entitled under succession law
- 3 Whether a testamentary bequest under the Indian Succession Act, 1925 in respect of shares/securities supersedes nomination under Section 109A and Bye-law 9.11
Ratio Decidendi
Nomination under Section 109A of the Companies Act, 1956 and Bye-law 9.11 of the Depositories Act, 1996 does not confer absolute beneficial ownership of shares or securities on the nominee to the exclusion of legal heirs; the vesting and non-obstante language must be read in context and operate for the limited purpose of enabling companies/depositories to deal with the securities immediately after the holder's death and to protect them from multiplicity of claims, but succession to the securities remains governed by the applicable succession laws.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed without any order on cost
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment