V.K. SURENDRA versus V.K. THIMMAIAH & ORS.
The properties were proved to be ancestral/joint family properties and Kunnaiah had no right to bequeath them by Will without consent of other co-parceners. Sons and Kunnaiah were each entitled to 1/5th share; daughters and descendant through daughter to 1/50th each. The appeal was dismissed and High Court's decree upheld.
- Parties
- Appellant Defendant No.3: V.K. Surendra; Respondents: V.K. Thimmaiah & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 10 April 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Partition Suit, Joint Family Property, Self Acquired Property, Ancestral Property, Execution of Will, Women's Share in Inheritance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
V.K. Surendra
Appellant Defendant No.3
V.K. Thimmaiah & Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the suit schedule properties are self-acquired or joint family (ancestral) properties
- 2 Whether the Will executed by late Shri Kunnaiah was valid to bequeath the joint family property
- 3 What are the shares of sons, daughters, and descendant through daughter in the property
Ratio Decidendi
The properties were proved to be ancestral/joint family properties and Kunnaiah had no right to bequeath them by Will without consent of other co-parceners. Sons and Kunnaiah were each entitled to 1/5th share; daughters and descendant through daughter to 1/50th each. The appeal was dismissed and High Court's decree upheld.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No interference with High Court judgment
- Parties to bear own costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment