BHAGWATI PRASAD SAH AND OTHERS versus BHAGWATI PRASAD SAH AND ANOTHER
A right of pre-emption can be exercised only where the property is held in full ownership by the transferor. Sale of leasehold interest in land is not pre-emptible under custom/Muhammadan law as adopted in Bihar, and the right of pre-emption cannot be claimed in respect of the super-structure (house) standing on such land. The law of pre-emption among co-sharers does not infringe fundamental rights under Article 19(1)(f).
- Parties
- Appellants: Bhagwati Prasad Sah and Others; Respondents: Bhagwati Prasad Sah and Another
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 10 October 1963
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court: Appeal by Special Leave From Judgment and Order of Patna High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Pre Emption Under Muhammadan Law, Right in Leasehold Vs. Full Ownership, Article 19(1)(f) Constitution of India, Customary Application of Pre Emption by Hindus, Limitation of Pre Emption Regarding Leasehold Property
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bhagwati Prasad Sah and Others
Appellants
Bhagwati Prasad Sah and Another
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court: Appeal by Special Leave From Judgment and Order of Patna High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the law of pre-emption as between co-sharers violates Article 19(1)(f) of the Constitution of India
- 2 Whether pre-emption is maintainable regarding leasehold (rent-paying) land and the super-structure thereon (house)
- 3 Whether the right of pre-emption can be exercised only for the entire property sold or also for part thereof
Ratio Decidendi
A right of pre-emption can be exercised only where the property is held in full ownership by the transferor. Sale of leasehold interest in land is not pre-emptible under custom/Muhammadan law as adopted in Bihar, and the right of pre-emption cannot be claimed in respect of the super-structure (house) standing on such land. The law of pre-emption among co-sharers does not infringe fundamental rights under Article 19(1)(f).
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed.
Orders
- Decrees of the Subordinate Judge's Court and the High Court set aside.
- Decree of the trial court (dismissing pre-emption suit) restored.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment