TULSA AND ORS. versus DURGHATIYA AND ORS.

TULSA AND ORS. versus DURGHATIYA AND ORS.

The act of marriage can be presumed from long-term cohabitation and recognition as husband and wife under Sections 50 and 114 of the Indian Evidence Act. The burden of disproving marriage falls on those challenging the relationship. The evidence substantiates that Lolli began living with Radhika Singh only after the death of her first husband, supporting the presumption of valid marriage and her consequent rights.

Parties
Appellants: Tulsa and Ors.; Respondents: Durghatiya and Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
15 January 2008
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Judgment Affirming First Appellate Court, Which Had Set Aside Trial Court Decree
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Presumption of Marriage, Validity of Marriage, Evidence of Cohabitation, Right to Ancestral Property
Family Law Evidence Law Property Law Presumption of Marriage Validity of Marriage Evidence of Cohabitation Right to Ancestral Property

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tulsa and Ors.

Appellants

Durghatiya and Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Judgment Affirming First Appellate Court, Which Had Set Aside Trial Court Decree

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Lolli (defendant no.1) was the legally married wife of Radhika Singh
  2. 2 Whether long-term cohabitation gives rise to presumption of valid marriage under the Evidence Act

Ratio Decidendi

The act of marriage can be presumed from long-term cohabitation and recognition as husband and wife under Sections 50 and 114 of the Indian Evidence Act. The burden of disproving marriage falls on those challenging the relationship. The evidence substantiates that Lolli began living with Radhika Singh only after the death of her first husband, supporting the presumption of valid marriage and her consequent rights.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • The judgment and decree of the first appellate court and the High Court are set aside; those of the trial court stand restored.
  • No order as to costs.