NIRMAL KUMAR KHANDELWAL versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

NIRMAL KUMAR KHANDELWAL versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Further detention beyond three months without order of confirmation by the appropriate Government under Section 8(f) of COFEPOSA is illegal, as the legal authority for detention lapses after three months unless properly confirmed; this interpretation is consistent with Article 22(4) of the Constitution and prior Supreme Court precedents.

Parties
Petitioner: Nirmal Kumar Khandelwal; Respondent No. 1: Union of India; Respondent No. 2: State of Maharashtra
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
01 May 1978
Procedural Posture
Criminal Writ Petition Under Article 32 for Habeas Corpus / Final Disposition Supreme Court Decision
Outcome
Petition allowed; detention quashed
Legal Topics
Preventive Detention, Habeas Corpus, Detention Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nirmal Kumar Khandelwal

Petitioner

Union of India

Respondent No. 1

State of Maharashtra

Respondent No. 2

Procedural Posture

Criminal Writ Petition Under Article 32 for Habeas Corpus / Final Disposition Supreme Court Decision

  1. 1 Whether detention beyond three months without an order of confirmation under Section 8(f) of COFEPOSA violates Article 22(4) of the Constitution

Ratio Decidendi

Further detention beyond three months without order of confirmation by the appropriate Government under Section 8(f) of COFEPOSA is illegal, as the legal authority for detention lapses after three months unless properly confirmed; this interpretation is consistent with Article 22(4) of the Constitution and prior Supreme Court precedents.

Court Disposition

Petition allowed; detention quashed

Orders

  • Detention of petitioner quashed
  • Petitioner to be set at liberty forthwith