RAZIA UMAR BAKSHI versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
The failure to provide the grounds of detention in a language known to the detenu and the absence of an affidavit by the person who explained the grounds vitiate the detention order. Further, the failure of the detaining authority to forward the detenu's representation to the Central Government, as statutorily required, renders the continued detention legally invalid.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Razia Umar Bakshi; Respondents: Union of India and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 23 June 1980
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India / Decision on Petition Challenging Validity of Preventive Detention
- Outcome
- Petition allowed. Detention declared legally invalid.
- Legal Topics
- Preventive Detention, Right to Be Informed of Grounds, Right to Representation, Procedural Safeguards, Translation of Detention Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Razia Umar Bakshi
Petitioner
Union of India and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India / Decision on Petition Challenging Validity of Preventive Detention
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether detention is vitiated if the grounds are not explained in a language known to the detenu.
- 2 Whether failure to forward the detenu's representation to the Central Government vitiates the detention.
Ratio Decidendi
The failure to provide the grounds of detention in a language known to the detenu and the absence of an affidavit by the person who explained the grounds vitiate the detention order. Further, the failure of the detaining authority to forward the detenu's representation to the Central Government, as statutorily required, renders the continued detention legally invalid.
Court Disposition
Petition allowed. Detention declared legally invalid.
Orders
- Detenu to be released forthwith.
- Order to be sent to the Jailor at Bhavnagar.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment