P.U. JOSHI AND ORS. versus THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, AHMEDABAD AND ORS.
Supervisors, not having passed the required Section Officers Grade Examination and not meeting the further criterion of three years of regular service as Section Officer, are not eligible for promotion to Assistant Accounts Officers even if the pay scales and some duties are similar; the discretion to set recruitment and promotion criteria lies with the State, and statutory Tribunals cannot substitute their own views or direct the Government to alter such rules.
- Parties
- Appellants: P.U. Joshi and others; Respondents: The Accountant General, Ahmedabad and others
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appellate Decision
- Outcome
- Appeals by Supervisors/Appellants dismissed; appeal by Union of India and department allowed; order of Tribunal at Cuttack set aside; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Promotion in Government Services, Recruitment Rules, Public Administration Restructuring, Equal Pay for Equal Work, Jurisdiction of Tribunals
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
P.U. Joshi and others
Appellants
The Accountant General, Ahmedabad and others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appellate Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Supervisors in the Department of Indian Audit and Accounts are entitled to promotion to the cadre of Assistant Accounts Officer on the ground of parity in pay scales and duties with Section Officers and A.A.Os;
- 2 Whether the Tribunal can direct the Government to adopt a particular method of recruitment, eligibility criteria or avenues of promotion
Ratio Decidendi
Supervisors, not having passed the required Section Officers Grade Examination and not meeting the further criterion of three years of regular service as Section Officer, are not eligible for promotion to Assistant Accounts Officers even if the pay scales and some duties are similar; the discretion to set recruitment and promotion criteria lies with the State, and statutory Tribunals cannot substitute their own views or direct the Government to alter such rules.
Court Disposition
Appeals by Supervisors/Appellants dismissed; appeal by Union of India and department allowed; order of Tribunal at Cuttack set aside; no order as to costs.
Orders
- Civil Appeal Nos. 4679-4680 of 1996 dismissed.
- Civil Appeal No. 10983 of 1996 allowed; order in O.A. No. 144/1991 set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment