PRAKASH NATH KHANNA AND ANR. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR.

PRAKASH NATH KHANNA AND ANR. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR.

Section 276-CC requires filing of return 'in due time', meaning within period prescribed under Section 139(1) or notice under Section 139(2), and not under Section 139(4); filing return under Section 139(4) before assessment but beyond 'due time' does not cure the statutory infraction. The presumption of culpable mental state under Section 278-E is a matter for trial and may be rebutted by the accused.

Parties
Appellants: Prakash Nath Khanna and another; Respondents: Commissioner of Income Tax and another
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
16 February 2004
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Himachal Pradesh High Court Judgment and Order Dated 21.11.96
Outcome
Appeals dismissed
Legal Topics
Prosecution for Failure to Furnish Tax Returns, Statutory Interpretation, Presumption of Culpable Mental State
Income Tax Law Criminal Law Prosecution for Failure to Furnish Tax Returns Statutory Interpretation Presumption of Culpable Mental State

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 18 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Prakash Nath Khanna and another

Appellants

Commissioner of Income Tax and another

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Himachal Pradesh High Court Judgment and Order Dated 21.11.96

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether filing a tax return under Section 139(4) before assessment amounts to compliance with Section 139(1) for prosecution under Section 276-CC
  2. 2 Whether discovery of tax evasion exceeding monetary limit is required for Section 276-CC to apply
  3. 3 Applicability and scope of presumption under Section 278-E regarding culpable mental state

Ratio Decidendi

Section 276-CC requires filing of return 'in due time', meaning within period prescribed under Section 139(1) or notice under Section 139(2), and not under Section 139(4); filing return under Section 139(4) before assessment but beyond 'due time' does not cure the statutory infraction. The presumption of culpable mental state under Section 278-E is a matter for trial and may be rebutted by the accused.

Court Disposition

Appeals dismissed

Orders

  • Appeals are dismissed.