IN RE: POLICY STRATEGY FOR GRANT OF BAIL versus
Where an appropriate Government has a policy for premature release, it must consider all eligible convicts without requiring a specific application; conditions attached to remission must be reasonable, capable of performance and aimed at rehabilitation and public safety; cancellation of remission requires compliance with natural justice (show cause, right to be heard, brief recorded reasons); and every order granting or refusing remission must contain brief reasons and be communicated to the convict with information on the right to challenge. States/UTs lacking policy must frame one within the prescribed time.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 18 February 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Suo Motu Writ Petition (criminal) No. 4 of 2021 / Judgment
- Outcome
- Directions issued
- Legal Topics
- Remission, Section 432 Cr PC, Section 473 BNSS, Conditions for Remission, Revocation/ Cancellation of Remission, Recording Reasons for Administrative Action, NALSA SOP on Premature Release
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Suo Motu Writ Petition (criminal) No. 4 of 2021 / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appropriate Government can grant remission without an application by the convict or on his behalf
- 2 Nature and scope of conditions that may be imposed when granting remission
- 3 Whether remission can be automatically revoked on breach of conditions and the procedure for cancellation
Ratio Decidendi
Where an appropriate Government has a policy for premature release, it must consider all eligible convicts without requiring a specific application; conditions attached to remission must be reasonable, capable of performance and aimed at rehabilitation and public safety; cancellation of remission requires compliance with natural justice (show cause, right to be heard, brief recorded reasons); and every order granting or refusing remission must contain brief reasons and be communicated to the convict with information on the right to challenge. States/UTs lacking policy must frame one within the prescribed time.
Court Disposition
Directions issued
Orders
- Where a State/UT has a policy for consideration of premature release under Section 432 CrPC or Section 473 BNSS, the appropriate Government must consider cases of all eligible convicts as they become eligible; specific application by the convict is not necessary (judgment paragraph 21(a))
- States and Union Territories without a policy dealing with grant of remission under Section 432 CrPC or Section 473 BNSS are directed to formulate an exhaustive policy within two months (judgment paragraph 21(b))
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment