CHHIDDA SINGH versus DY. DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION AND ORS.

CHHIDDA SINGH versus DY. DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION AND ORS.

No error, much less error apparent on the face of record is demonstrated; review petition is mere verbatim repetition of SLP; filing such review petitions is an abuse of the process of the Court and is deprecated.

Parties
Petitioner: Chhidda Singh; Respondents: Dy. Director of Consolidation and others
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
19 February 1998
Procedural Posture
Review Petition / Supreme Court Review Petition No. 315 of 1998, Against Dismissal of Special Leave Petition (c) No. 6347 of 1997
Outcome
Review petition dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Review Jurisdiction, Abuse of Process, Consolidation Proceedings
Constitutional Law Civil Procedure Review Jurisdiction Abuse of Process Consolidation Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Chhidda Singh

Petitioner

Dy. Director of Consolidation and others

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Review Petition / Supreme Court Review Petition No. 315 of 1998, Against Dismissal of Special Leave Petition (c) No. 6347 of 1997

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the review petition demonstrates any error apparent on the face of record warranting review
  2. 2 Whether the review petition is an abuse of the process of the Court

Ratio Decidendi

No error, much less error apparent on the face of record is demonstrated; review petition is mere verbatim repetition of SLP; filing such review petitions is an abuse of the process of the Court and is deprecated.

Court Disposition

Review petition dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Review Petition No. 315 of 1998 is dismissed.
  • Costs of Rs. 5,000 imposed to be recovered under Rules.