BABU LAL versus HARYANA STATE AGRICULTURAL MKT. BOARD

BABU LAL versus HARYANA STATE AGRICULTURAL MKT. BOARD

Plaintiff-appellant is not entitled to salary for period between 2.11.1995 and 30.3.2001, as he had not actually worked during that period, and additional charge was given without extra remuneration. Office memorandum and Exhibit P-5 substantiate that no arrears will be paid for periods not worked.

Parties
Plaintiff Appellant: Babu Lal; Defendant Respondent: Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
11 February 2008
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against High Court Judgment Dismissing Suit
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Salary Claim, Service Promotion, Arrears of Pay
Employment Law Civil Procedure Salary Claim Service Promotion Arrears of Pay

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Babu Lal

Plaintiff Appellant

Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board

Defendant Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal Against High Court Judgment Dismissing Suit

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether plaintiff-appellant is entitled to salary for period not actually worked
  2. 2 Whether denial of salary for intervening period post-exoneration is justified

Ratio Decidendi

Plaintiff-appellant is not entitled to salary for period between 2.11.1995 and 30.3.2001, as he had not actually worked during that period, and additional charge was given without extra remuneration. Office memorandum and Exhibit P-5 substantiate that no arrears will be paid for periods not worked.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Judgment and decree of High Court affirmed
  • Judgment of trial court restored