COL. D.D. JOSHI AND OTHERS versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

COL. D.D. JOSHI AND OTHERS versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

The revised period of ante-dating introduced by Army Instruction No. 78/78 and made effective from April 1, 1978, for new entrants only, does not violate Articles 14 or 16 of the Constitution. The incentive is legitimately prospective for attracting future recruits and does not divide a homogeneous class or constitute arbitrary discrimination. Officers previously commissioned received the benefit applicable at the time of their commission, and subsequent enlargement does not create a right to retrospective application.

Parties
Petitioners: Col. D.D. Joshi and others; Respondents: Union of India and others
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
01 March 1983
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition Under Article 32 / Supreme Court Original Jurisdiction; Final Judgment
Outcome
Petitions dismissed
Legal Topics
Seniority, Ante Dating of Commission, Discrimination, Article 14, Article 16, Interpretation of Statutes, Necessary Party
Service Law Constitutional Law Administrative Law Seniority Ante Dating of Commission Discrimination Article 14 Article 16 +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Col. D.D. Joshi and others

Petitioners

Union of India and others

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Writ Petition Under Article 32 / Supreme Court Original Jurisdiction; Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the upward revision in the period of benefit by ante-dating under Army Instruction No. 78/78 is discriminatory and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.
  2. 2 Interpretation and applicability of clauses and Note under Army Instruction No. 78/78 regarding ante-dating of commission.

Ratio Decidendi

The revised period of ante-dating introduced by Army Instruction No. 78/78 and made effective from April 1, 1978, for new entrants only, does not violate Articles 14 or 16 of the Constitution. The incentive is legitimately prospective for attracting future recruits and does not divide a homogeneous class or constitute arbitrary discrimination. Officers previously commissioned received the benefit applicable at the time of their commission, and subsequent enlargement does not create a right to retrospective application.

Court Disposition

Petitions dismissed

Orders

  • All the petitions are dismissed with no order as to costs.