PREMJI RATANSEY SHAH AND ORS versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

PREMJI RATANSEY SHAH AND ORS versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Injunction is a discretionary equitable relief and cannot be issued to protect possession unless the applicant has lawful interest. Since the petitioners had no title or lawful possession, and could not derive interest from a void sale, no injunction could be granted to them as against the true owner (the railways/Union of India).

Parties
Petitioners: Premji Ratansey Shah and Others; Respondents: Union of India and Others
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
22 July 1994
Procedural Posture
Special Leave Petition / Supreme Court Decision on Appeal From Division Bench of Bombay High Court
Outcome
Petition dismissed with exemplary costs.
Legal Topics
Specific Relief Act Section 41(j), Injunction, Land Acquisition, Possession, Declaration, Trespasser

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Premji Ratansey Shah and Others

Petitioners

Union of India and Others

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Special Leave Petition / Supreme Court Decision on Appeal From Division Bench of Bombay High Court

  1. 1 Whether an injunction can be granted to protect possession when the plaintiff has no lawful title or interest in the property
  2. 2 Whether injunction can be issued in favour of a person in unlawful possession as against the true owner

Ratio Decidendi

Injunction is a discretionary equitable relief and cannot be issued to protect possession unless the applicant has lawful interest. Since the petitioners had no title or lawful possession, and could not derive interest from a void sale, no injunction could be granted to them as against the true owner (the railways/Union of India).

Court Disposition

Petition dismissed with exemplary costs.

Orders

  • Special Leave Petition is dismissed with exemplary costs of Rs. 30,000 payable to Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee.
  • If costs are not paid within two months, the Committee may recover by execution.