BIRMA DEVI & ORS. versus SUBHASH & ANR.
Where exclusive possession of the suit property is with the contracting party, a decree for specific performance simpliciter may give complete relief to the decree-holder including delivery of possession; but where possession cannot be effectively granted without a specific claim (for example, jointly held property or possession by a third person), the plaintiff must claim transfer of possession. Section 22 permits amendment to plead such relief at any stage, including execution, and the executing court may grant possession in appropriate cases. The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition, upholding the High Court's application of these principles.
- Parties
- Petitioners (subsequent Purchasers): Birma Devi & Ors.; Respondents (original Plaintiffs and Decree Holders): Subhash & Anr.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 06 December 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Special Leave Petition (civil) / Judgment on Special Leave Petition Before the Supreme Court (slp Dismissed)
- Outcome
- Special Leave Petition dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Specific Performance, Relief of Possession, Execution Proceedings, Amendment of Plaint Under Section 22
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Birma Devi & Ors.
Petitioners (subsequent Purchasers)
Subhash & Anr.
Respondents (original Plaintiffs and Decree Holders)
Procedural Posture
Special Leave Petition (civil) / Judgment on Special Leave Petition Before the Supreme Court (slp Dismissed)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the executing court may grant possession where the suit is decreed for specific performance simpliciter and no express relief for transfer of possession was granted
Ratio Decidendi
Where exclusive possession of the suit property is with the contracting party, a decree for specific performance simpliciter may give complete relief to the decree-holder including delivery of possession; but where possession cannot be effectively granted without a specific claim (for example, jointly held property or possession by a third person), the plaintiff must claim transfer of possession. Section 22 permits amendment to plead such relief at any stage, including execution, and the executing court may grant possession in appropriate cases. The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition, upholding the High Court's application of these principles.
Court Disposition
Special Leave Petition dismissed
Orders
- Special Leave Petition dismissed
- Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment