JAYANTBHAI MANUBHAI PATEL AND OTHERS versus ARUN SUBODHBHAI MEHTA AND OTHERS
The Mayor of a Municipal Corporation, having statutory power to convene meetings under Clause 1(c) of Chapter II of the Schedule to the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949, also has implied power under Section 21 of the Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904 to cancel or postpone a meeting before its commencement, provided the power is exercised bona fide and for a proper purpose.
- Parties
- Appellant No. 1 / Mayor of Bhavnagar Municipal Corporation: JAYANTBHAI MANUBHAI PATEL; Appellant No. 2 / Deputy Mayor of Bhavnagar Municipal Corporation: Appellant No. 2 (not named individually in the text); Appellant No. 3 / Secretary of Bhavnagar Municipal Corporation: Appellant No. 3 (Secretary of Corporation, not named individually in the text); Respondent No. 1 / Claimant Mayor Elect: ARUN SUBODHBHAI MEHTA; Respondent No. 2 / Claimant Deputy Mayor Elect: Respondent No. 2 (not named individually in the text); Respondent No. 3: Respondent No. 3 (not named individually in the text); Respondent No. 5 (the Corporation): Bhavnagar Municipal Corporation
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 28 March 1989
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Civil Appeal No. 1994 of 1989, Appeal by Special Leave From Gujarat High Court Judgment Dated 28.10.88 in L.p.a. 236 of 1988
- Outcome
- Appeal partly allowed, matter remanded to the Gujarat High Court to determine whether Mayor exercised power bona fide; interim order to continue till 5 May 1989.
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Powers of Mayor, Cancellation/postponement of Meeting, Interpretation of Municipal/statutory Provisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
JAYANTBHAI MANUBHAI PATEL
Appellant No. 1 / Mayor of Bhavnagar Municipal Corporation
Appellant No. 2 (not named individually in the text)
Appellant No. 2 / Deputy Mayor of Bhavnagar Municipal Corporation
Appellant No. 3 (Secretary of Corporation, not named individually in the text)
Appellant No. 3 / Secretary of Bhavnagar Municipal Corporation
ARUN SUBODHBHAI MEHTA
Respondent No. 1 / Claimant Mayor Elect
Respondent No. 2 (not named individually in the text)
Respondent No. 2 / Claimant Deputy Mayor Elect
Respondent No. 3 (not named individually in the text)
Respondent No. 3
Bhavnagar Municipal Corporation
Respondent No. 5 (the Corporation)
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Civil Appeal No. 1994 of 1989, Appeal by Special Leave From Gujarat High Court Judgment Dated 28.10.88 in L.p.a. 236 of 1988
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Mayor of Municipal Corporation can cancel the notice and postpone the meeting convened by him before the meeting is held under the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949.
- 2 Applicability of Section 21 of the Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904 to the Mayor’s power to postpone/cancel meetings.
Ratio Decidendi
The Mayor of a Municipal Corporation, having statutory power to convene meetings under Clause 1(c) of Chapter II of the Schedule to the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949, also has implied power under Section 21 of the Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904 to cancel or postpone a meeting before its commencement, provided the power is exercised bona fide and for a proper purpose.
Court Disposition
Appeal partly allowed, matter remanded to the Gujarat High Court to determine whether Mayor exercised power bona fide; interim order to continue till 5 May 1989.
Orders
- Matter remanded to Gujarat High Court for determination whether Mayor exercised cancellation/postponement power bona fide and within scope of Act.
- High Court requested to dispose of the writ petition by 30 April 1989.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment