G.M. HARYANA ROADWAYS versus JAI BHAGWAN AND ANR.
Suppression of material facts and delay/laches, especially by the State, is a serious abuse of process; discretionary relief under Article 136 is rightly denied and exemplary costs quantified for such conduct.
- Parties
- Petitioner: G.M. Haryana Roadways; Respondent No.1: Jai Bhagwan; Respondent No.2: Anr.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 05 March 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Special Leave Petition (civil) No. 23385 of 2004 / Supreme Court Dismissal of SLP
- Outcome
- Special Leave Petition dismissed with exemplary costs.
- Legal Topics
- Suppression of Material Facts, Delay and Laches, Reinstatement of Workers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
G.M. Haryana Roadways
Petitioner
Jai Bhagwan
Respondent No.1
Anr.
Respondent No.2
Procedural Posture
Special Leave Petition (civil) No. 23385 of 2004 / Supreme Court Dismissal of SLP
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether suppression of material facts by the State disentitles relief under Article 136
- 2 Whether delay and laches bar the grant of special leave
- 3 Whether exemplary costs should be imposed for abuse of court process
Ratio Decidendi
Suppression of material facts and delay/laches, especially by the State, is a serious abuse of process; discretionary relief under Article 136 is rightly denied and exemplary costs quantified for such conduct.
Court Disposition
Special Leave Petition dismissed with exemplary costs.
Orders
- Petition dismissed.
- Exemplary cost of Rs.1,00,000/- to be paid to National Legal Services Authority within four weeks, failing which it will be recovered with interest at 12% per annum.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment