SMT. KAUSHALYA DEVI versus SHRI MOOL RAJ AND OTHERS
The Magistrate's action in making a counter-affidavit opposing the accused's application for transfer constituted a grave impropriety and compromised judicial impartiality. Therefore, irrespective of the merits of the applicant's other contentions, expediency in the ends of justice requires that the case be transferred to another court of competent jurisdiction.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Smt. Kaushalya Devi; Respondents: Shri Mool Raj and others
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 04 September 1963
- Procedural Posture
- Transfer Petition / Final Order on Transfer Application
- Outcome
- Transfer ordered
- Legal Topics
- Transfer of Cases, Judicial Impartiality, Impropriety of Affidavits by Presiding Magistrate
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Smt. Kaushalya Devi
Petitioner
Shri Mool Raj and others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Transfer Petition / Final Order on Transfer Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether it is proper for a Magistrate, in whose court a criminal case is pending, to file an affidavit opposing an application for transfer of the case.
- 2 Whether the ends of justice require transfer of a pending criminal case when the presiding Magistrate has entered the arena by making a counter-affidavit.
Ratio Decidendi
The Magistrate's action in making a counter-affidavit opposing the accused's application for transfer constituted a grave impropriety and compromised judicial impartiality. Therefore, irrespective of the merits of the applicant's other contentions, expediency in the ends of justice requires that the case be transferred to another court of competent jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
Transfer ordered
Orders
- The criminal proceedings pending against the petitioner and three other persons are transferred from the court of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Delhi, to a competent court in Saharanpur, Uttar Pradesh. The District Magistrate, Saharanpur, is directed to nominate a magistrate to try the case.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment