JAGDISH PRASAD AND ORS. ETC. ETC. versus M.C.D. THROUGH COMMISSIONER AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

JAGDISH PRASAD AND ORS. ETC. ETC. versus M.C.D. THROUGH COMMISSIONER AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

The petitioners were allotted staff quarters by DESU solely as employees, under rental arrangements, without any resolution or policy for transfer of ownership or sale, and DESU was precluded by loan terms from sale; therefore, they have no legal right to claim ownership nor is there any ground for promissory estoppel or equality to apply; their petitions are dismissed.

Parties
Petitioners: Jagdish Prasad and Others; Respondents: M.C.D. Through Commissioner and Others
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
17 December 1992
Procedural Posture
Special Leave Petition (civil) / Final Disposition by Supreme Court
Outcome
Special Leave Petitions dismissed
Legal Topics
Transfer of Ownership of Government Constructed Staff Quarters, Promissory Estoppel by Public Authorities, Equality Before Law Under Article 14
Constitutional Law Administrative Law Transfer of Ownership of Government Constructed Staff Quarters Promissory Estoppel by Public Authorities Equality Before Law Under Article 14

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jagdish Prasad and Others

Petitioners

M.C.D. Through Commissioner and Others

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Special Leave Petition (civil) / Final Disposition by Supreme Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether allottees of staff quarters under the Low Income Housing Scheme, 1954, are entitled to claim ownership rights in the quarters allotted to them as employees of DESU
  2. 2 Whether the principle of equality or promissory estoppel applies to require DESU/MCD to transfer ownership of the quarters to its employees under similar terms as a Municipal Corporation decision for its own employees

Ratio Decidendi

The petitioners were allotted staff quarters by DESU solely as employees, under rental arrangements, without any resolution or policy for transfer of ownership or sale, and DESU was precluded by loan terms from sale; therefore, they have no legal right to claim ownership nor is there any ground for promissory estoppel or equality to apply; their petitions are dismissed.

Court Disposition

Special Leave Petitions dismissed

Orders

  • Petitions dismissed with no order as to costs