SHIV KUMARI DEVENDRA OJHA versus RAMAJOR SHITLA PRASAD OJHA AND ORS.

SHIV KUMARI DEVENDRA OJHA versus RAMAJOR SHITLA PRASAD OJHA AND ORS.

Since respondents agree to bear the petitioner's travel and stay expenses for attending proceedings at Valsad, Gujarat, there is no sufficient justification to transfer the succession application to Pratapgarh; directions given for advance payment and liberty to seek financial assistance for engaging counsel at Valsad.

Parties
Petitioner: Shiv Kumari Devendra Ojha; Respondents: Ramajor Shitla Prasad Ojha and Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
13 January 1997
Procedural Posture
Transfer Petition (c) No. 281 of 1996 / Order on Transfer Petition
Outcome
Transfer petition disposed of.
Legal Topics
Transfer of Proceedings, Succession Application

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Shiv Kumari Devendra Ojha

Petitioner

Ramajor Shitla Prasad Ojha and Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Transfer Petition (c) No. 281 of 1996 / Order on Transfer Petition

  1. 1 Whether succession application pending before Civil Judge, Valsad, Gujarat should be transferred to Civil Judge, Pratapgarh District, Uttar Pradesh given petitioner's inability to travel and bear expenses.

Ratio Decidendi

Since respondents agree to bear the petitioner's travel and stay expenses for attending proceedings at Valsad, Gujarat, there is no sufficient justification to transfer the succession application to Pratapgarh; directions given for advance payment and liberty to seek financial assistance for engaging counsel at Valsad.

Court Disposition

Transfer petition disposed of.

Orders

  • Respondents to pay Rs. 750 to petitioner on each occasion she attends court, amount to be paid in advance.
  • Petitioner may file application for financial assistance to engage counsel at Valsad.