SHYAM KISHORE AND ORS. versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ANR.
Section 170(b) of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 is constitutional and intra vires; it bars the hearing or determination of an appeal on merits unless disputed tax is deposited, but does not bar admission or entertainment of the appeal. The District Judge has no jurisdiction to stay collection or waive deposit, but may judicially adjourn hearings or grant time for payment before the appeal is heard.
- Parties
- Appellants: Shyam Kishore and Others; Respondents: Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Another
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 03 September 1992
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Disposition by Supreme Court
- Outcome
- Appeal disposed of; Section 170(b) upheld as intra vires; District Judge may adjourn hearing to allow deposit but cannot stay collection.
- Legal Topics
- Validity of Statutory Pre Deposit Requirements for Appeals, Interpretation of Statutory Provisions Restricting Appeal Hearing, Article 14 Constitutional Challenge, Availability of Writ Remedies Where Statutory Appeals Exist
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shyam Kishore and Others
Appellants
Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Another
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Disposition by Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Section 170(b) of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 imposing pre-deposit condition for hearing appeals is unconstitutional under Article 14 of the Constitution
- 2 Whether the appellate authority (District Judge) can waive or stay collection of disputed tax pending appeal
- 3 Interpretation of 'heard or determined' in Section 170(b): whether bars the hearing but not entertainment/admission of appeal
Ratio Decidendi
Section 170(b) of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 is constitutional and intra vires; it bars the hearing or determination of an appeal on merits unless disputed tax is deposited, but does not bar admission or entertainment of the appeal. The District Judge has no jurisdiction to stay collection or waive deposit, but may judicially adjourn hearings or grant time for payment before the appeal is heard.
Court Disposition
Appeal disposed of; Section 170(b) upheld as intra vires; District Judge may adjourn hearing to allow deposit but cannot stay collection.
Orders
- Section 170(b) interpreted as bar to hearing, not to entertainment/admission of appeal.
- District Judge cannot waive deposit or stay collection; may judicially adjourn or allow time for deposit before hearing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment