RAM AVTAR AND ORS. versus RAM DHANI AND ORS
Smt. Phoola, having been put in possession of land under a family compromise and so recorded, was in possession as intermediary at the vesting date and thus became bhumidhar under Section 18, entitling her to absolute rights including transfer; Section 11 did not apply.
- Parties
- Appellants: Ram Avtar and Ors.; Respondents: Ram Dhani and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 26 September 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Decision on Appeal From Allahabad High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Widow's Rights, Maintenance, Succession, Mutation of Land Records, U.p. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, U.p. Consolidation of Holdings Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ram Avtar and Ors.
Appellants
Ram Dhani and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Decision on Appeal From Allahabad High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Smt. Phoola had absolute right to transfer the property received for maintenance under a family compromise in 1932.
- 2 Whether Section 18 or Section 11 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 applies to the widow's interest.
Ratio Decidendi
Smt. Phoola, having been put in possession of land under a family compromise and so recorded, was in possession as intermediary at the vesting date and thus became bhumidhar under Section 18, entitling her to absolute rights including transfer; Section 11 did not apply.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Order of Deputy Director (Consolidation) set aside.
- Orders of Consolidation Officer and Settlement Officer (Consolidation) restored.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment