JYOTSNA DWIVEDI versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

JYOTSNA DWIVEDI versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

The Ministry has substantially complied with earlier directions, with only 9 cases pending (2 before the High Court). With steps taken as explained in the Affidavit, writ petition need not remain pending in the Supreme Court. Parties to approach High Court for remaining matters.

Parties
Petitioner: Jyotsna Dwivedi; Respondents: Union of India & Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
19 February 2007
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (civil) Under Article 32 / Final Disposition by Supreme Court
Outcome
Writ Petition disposed of
Legal Topics
Writ of Mandamus, Welfare Schemes, Kargil War Martyrs, Petroleum and LPG Allotments
Constitutional Law Writ of Mandamus Welfare Schemes Kargil War Martyrs Petroleum and LPG Allotments

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jyotsna Dwivedi

Petitioner

Union of India & Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Writ Petition (civil) Under Article 32 / Final Disposition by Supreme Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether respondents are fulfilling promises of welfare package allotments to widows of Kargil war martyrs

Ratio Decidendi

The Ministry has substantially complied with earlier directions, with only 9 cases pending (2 before the High Court). With steps taken as explained in the Affidavit, writ petition need not remain pending in the Supreme Court. Parties to approach High Court for remaining matters.

Court Disposition

Writ Petition disposed of

Orders

  • No further orders on application for impleadment.
  • I.As., applications for directions, disposed of.